On Saturday 27 June 2009 23:39:13 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > As I stated elsewhere, #2 is the reason. My only gripe, if you can call > > it that, is that it all happens so automatically that there is no > > opportunity to pause, make backups and think out consequences such as > > this. > > Uh, how automatically? I didn't even get offered the upgrade on my F9 and > F10 machines (are you running GNOME or XFCE or something like that on those > machines? No, just F10 updated from kde-fedora, KDE desktop. > Because I'm not aware of KPackageKit even supporting those > preupgrade notifications), Someone else on this (or user?) list has mentioned the same thing in the last 24 hours. > and in any case there's the option to decline > (and run preupgrade by hand later if you really want to upgrade). > Sure - but it's all or nothing. Yes/No/Later would be great. The truth is that I had intended doing a clean install. Being offered that automatic upgrade seduced me. I'm not complaining about that, but as it stands I do think there is a pressure to do it at that particular moment. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090628/b397c222/attachment.bin
