On Wednesday 24 June 2009 10:41:01 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > On Wednesday 24 June 2009 12:29:17 Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 June 2009 09:51:04 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > > On Wednesday 24 June 2009 11:35:55 Anne Wilson wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 24 June 2009 09:00:53 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday 24 June 2009 10:15:08 Anne Wilson wrote: > > > > > > I'm wondering if part of the problem is that I disabled all repos > > > > > > except fedora and fedora-updates. Those f10 packages are from > > > > > > fedora-kde. Is the high version number there interfering? > > > > > > > > > > Yes... > > > > > > > > > > You missed part of the magic of using yum to update the system. All > > > > > repos should be enabled as usual. So that you can maintain the rep > > > > > and package priorities that you have set. Otherwise you could very > > > > > easily break something. > > > > > > > > > :-) That seems to explain a lot. A large update is currently taking > > > > : place. > > > > > > > > I'll report back. > > > > > > > > Anne > > > > > > Good to hear. One last thing about the current update.... > > > > > > After this one completes, then you should run... > > > > > > yum --allow-downgrade update > > > > > > It does happen becuase of build number from the more recent version is > > > less than the build from the previous version. As such yum would think > > > that the version installed from, lets say Fedora 10 is newer than the > > > build from Fedora 11 and you wouldn't know it. > > > > Hmm - problem. "Command line error: no such option: --allow-downgrade" > > > > I now have a kde install. There are still a few fc10 packages around: > > > > google-gadgets-0.10.5-7 > > libdcp4client-4.0.0-35 > > neon-0.28.4-1.1 > > iptables-ipv6-1.4.3.2-1 > > ca-certificates-2009-1 > > kbackup-0.5.4-1 > > GeoIP-1.4.6-2 > > libtalloc-1.2.0-31 > > compat-db45-4.5.20 > > sudo-1.7.1-2 > > kompose-0.5.3-13 > > iptables-1.4.3.2-1 > > google-gadgets-qt-0.10.5-7 > > libtar-1.2.11-11 > > kipi-plugins-0.3.0-1 > > > > I presume these are the ones that will be taken care of by the --allow- > > download? (The yum help file doesn't show --allow-downgrade.) > > > > Anne > > Check to see if yum-plugin-allowdowngrade-1.1.21-2.fc11.noarch has been > installed and > It wasn't - I thought it was part of yum-utils. > /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/allowdowngrade.conf > > has been configured so that it enabled = 1 > Yes, it is. > Also, do you have your other repos like rpmfusion enabled? If not, then > enable them making sure that you are getting the right updates. > Everything I had enabled before is currently enabled, but it still says that nothing needs updating. > By the way. Is X finally running? > Yes it is. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090624/8b93dbe9/attachment.bin
