On Sunday 26 April 2009 18:19:48 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 05:32 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190476 > > > > Want me to close this as INVALID? ;-) > > > > I don't see how the dependency is a bug at all, nor do I understand the > > point of absolutely wanting to remove a package just to remove it. Disk > > space is cheap. Its a packaging error because the package is not required to make marble work. If digikam it is not required it is not a dependency. An error In computer parlance is called a bug. > You're missing the point. I don't care about the disk space, but I do > care about having to download a 30MB package that I'm never going to use > over a slow DSL line, Slow DSL Line. What's you're throughput when downloading the packages? > not only on first installation but also on > subsequent updates. I'm sure people on dialup feel even more strongly > about this. This is more than likely. Eli -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090426/b7001a61/attachment.html
