On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:37 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 07:44 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Based on the work of a fellow contributor, I've massaged and built a > >> soprano-backend-sesame2 package for testing purposes, and stuffed into > >> kde-redhat/unstable F-10 repo. > >> soprano-backend-sesame2 > >> > >> As I said, it's for testing purposes only, and includes binary .jars, > >> which aren't built from source... so it's not acceptable yet for > >> inclusion in fedora proper. > > > > <grumble> > > I wish people would give even a hint of what packages are when they > > announce them. I monitor the Gnome-announce list as well and this kind > > of thing also happens there quite a lot. I'd take even money that no > > more than 5% of the members of this list knows what > > soprano-backend-sesame2 is without poking around with Google or "yum > > info ...". Is it so hard to write a one-line description? Good grief, if > > the thing's in an rpm it must already exist. > > </grumble> > > It's not ready for primetime, but for testing only at this point. > > If you don't know what it is, then you probably aren't a good candidate > for testing it. Sorry Rex, but that makes no sense at all. You mean only people who already know about this beforehand can test it? No-one who doesn't already know could possibly be interested or have anything to add to the testing process? Why is it in a public repo again? poc
