KDE4 effects Xrender vs OpenGL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> Indeed, OpenGL is normally faster unless you have a really crappy graphics
> driver.

For reference, here's the "really crappy graphics driver" on my
(cheap) laptop where XRender is smooth and nice and OpenGL is horribly
slow:
    Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
    943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

However, on my netbook -- where the performance of the two
acceleration methods is exactly reversed -- lspci gives EXACTLY the
same output for the display controller.

Whatever. I'm not complaining, I've found settings that work on each
machine. But it's very weird ... :)

MEF

-- 
Mary Ellen Foster  --  http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/
Informatik 6: Robotics and Embedded Systems, Technische Universit?t M?nchen
and ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh



[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux