On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:09:10 Rex Dieter wrote: > Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > If you mean that KDE 4.3 and KDE 4.4 final will not be stable > > I think what *I* can boil-down from this conversation is varying > degrees, definitions, interpretations of what it means to be: > * usable > * stable > * releasable > > I'd welcome a conversation to be able to be able to (as much as > possible) clearly define what we (fedora) consider these to be, so that > when any such future confusion arises, we can point to the bright neon > sign (wiki page?) outlining such. > I think this is a very good idea. How do we begin in an orderly fashion? Perhaps you could start the ball rolling with your thoughts and we can all take it from there. Eli -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
