On Monday 26 January 2009 05:12:34 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > On Monday 26 January 2009 06:18:14 Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > Someone has to take the pain of the new tech. At this point in the > > life of GNU/Linux, Fedora is that place. The Fedora leaders need to > > either embrace this or not, and educate users accordingly. > > Yes... this is true. It's one of the main reason that I'm using Fedora. > However, new tech shouldn't mean premature tech. It should get past the > development stage KDE 4.0, Xorg 1.5 BETA (Fedora), RPM 4.6.0 RC3 (Fedora > 10). There are probably other packages that I'm not aware of that fit into > this category. > > Again. Bleeding Edge STABLE Good. Just plain bleeding... bad... very bad. > Eli, how does it get there without really side testing on thousands of different hardware setups? Linux generally is a coooperative venture. It needs input from its users. One attraction of using a bleeding edge distro like Fedora is so that we can influence development. I use more stable distros where I need to. Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090126/5dc33dae/attachment.bin
