Kevin Kofler wrote: > Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Applications installed in Fedora/KDE may or may not >> appear in the F-menu, and if they do appear there >> I find it impossible to predict where they will appear, >> eg does anyone understand the difference between Administration, >> System and Settings? > > But the menu organization was already like that in KDE 3! So how is this a > KDE 4 regression? I wasn't comparing KDE-3 with KDE-4 when I made the above remark. I was comparing Fedora/KDE with Windows XP. My (different) point about KDE-4 was that as far as I am concerned it is neither better nor worse than KDE-3, just different. I don't see the huge advantages it is supposed to have, and I haven't suffered from the terrible disasters others seem to have met. This is probably because I don't do anything very clever, with 95% of my time spent in kmail, knode and Firefox. But the net effect was that for me, KDE-4 just meant a number of small but slightly annoying changes, which from my limited perspective seemed pointless.
