On Saturday 24 January 2009 14:59:55 Claude Jones wrote: > On Saturday 24 January 2009 01:08:56 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > I do... There have been huge performance improvements with the new kmail. > > I'm just amazed at how quick things are now. > > Interesting...I was going to post about how sluggish Kmail had become > for me; this happens when I go from folder to folder, particularly a large > folder with lots of messages like my Fedora-list or even this one; at > bottom left of the window, you can see that kmail is doing some sort of > indexing and you can watch the numbers go up as it counts various things - > and all this has to occur before a message is displayed; previously, I > would hit the key to go to next message when I was on the last message in a > folder, it would advance to the first unread message in the next folder, > and the message would almost be instantaneously displayed - now there's a > very large pause - on Fedora-list which has around 7000 messages in it at > any given time (I have it set to delete after 90 days), this can take 13 > seconds (I just measured it).... I'm not sure what's going on here. I see that sometimes, but at other times it moves on just as quickly as it ever did. So far I haven't noticed any pattern to the behaviour. Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090124/dca9f433/attachment.bin
