On Saturday 24 January 2009 07:15:14 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > On Saturday 24 January 2009 08:56:02 Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Eli Wapniarski > > > > <eli at orbsky.homelinux.org> wrote: > > > On Friday 23 January 2009 22:28:40 Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > >> URL : > > >> http://adymo.blogspot.com/2009/01/kde-42-review-from-inside-out-part-2 > > >>.h tml > > >> > > >> I can't say I really agree with the KMail part, but we'll see. > > > > > > I do... There have been huge performance improvements with the new > > > kmail. I'm just amazed at how quick things are now. > > > > Where are you using the Kmail 4? On F9, I still have Kmail 3.5. I > > find the interface fairly cluttered. > > kdepim 4.1.96 which includes kontact 1.3 kmail 1.11.0 on Fedora 10. > I'm finding that version quite unstable, which, I'm told, is due to a bug in the RC1. I understand that when we get the full 4.2 the problem will disappear, so I'm looking forward to the upgrade. Anne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090124/c04c0734/attachment.bin
