On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 08:55:58AM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > Hey folks! > > I have a few questions about the final deployment of the FMN replacement: > > - There's been a request to handle a user being disabled in IPA, which > should trigger their rules being disabled (FMN#826). We can do that > but we have questions about re-enablement: should the rules be > auto-enabled when the user is re-enabled? What about rules that the > user may have disabled previously? Should we just leave things > disabled? I think this is a pretty rare case. I guess I would expect to just leave them all disabled and let the user go enable them again once they can log back in? > > - How do you see the transition to the new system? We were thinking: > - move the current FMN to a different URL, such as > notifications-old.fp.o. It will still be processing messages and > sending notifications > - run the new system in notifications.fp.o (in place of the old) > - add a small banner to the new system to point people to the old in > case they want to change their rules there > Is it too quick? Should we deploy the new one to a notifications-new > URL first? That's one more step to get to the final setup, so more > work for you. You get to decide :-) > → Michal & Kevin are fine with this plan. yep. I think smooges suggestion downthread to announce the plan is good. and schedule a time to roll out the new and move the old so people know to expect it. > > - IRC account: we can't connect to libera.chat with the same account > twice, we'll need a second account. I can create it, but do you prefer > that we: > 1. run the old FMN on the new account (fedora-notifs-old) and the > new FMN on the usual account > 2. run the old FMN on the usual account and the new FMN on the new > account (fedora-notifs-new) and then switch back to the usual one when > we retire the old FMN > 3. run the old FMN on the usual account and the new FMN on a new > account (fedora-fmn) and just drop the old account when we retire the > old FMN > (I guess that's connected to the URL transition issue) > → Kevin prefers option 3. yep. since people will be setting things up new it makes sense to me to have a new user messaging you. Also less swapping around, its just setup and done. > > - Let's do an "ask us anything" session for infra people. We can do > that on IRC or you can ask all your questions in this email thread. +1 > - When should we do the switch? > → Kevin suggests next week, with an email to devel-announce. > > What do you think? I've had a few answers from Michal & Kevin already > and added them inline. > > Kevin also notes that we may need a RHIT ticket to allow IRC out from > OpenShift. I'll test it as soon as I've created the new IRC account. > He also suggests a sunset date for the old FMN after the F39 release. yep! thanks! kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
