On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 09:16:51PM -0000, Pedro Moura wrote: > > I'm interested to hear from others if those subplanets are much used > > anymore. :) > > > > IMHO, we should probibly just try and make things as simple as possible > > to start with. I'd say we could even drop the subplanets unless people > > are really using them/expecting them anymore. > > > > Given that there are no frequent updates on .planet, I also believe we could drop the subplanets. Yeah, hopefully. It might be possible to reach out to those groups... design, security? They have irc rooms, we could try asking there? (I don't recall all the subplanets we have...) > Additionally, a list could be implemented on Noggin where users could add multiple blog links, considering the fact that some users have more than one blog and later query those links from FASjson to build planet. yeah, that sounds reasonable to me. Will require noggin changes tho. > Furthermore, I wonder if we should close the old issue, which requests the migration of Venus to Pluto, and create a new one explaining the current goal of changing the process of Fedora Planet and deploying it on OCP. We could, but it's really just a continuation of that... > Please let us know your thoughts on these proposals. We look forward to working together to improve the Fedora Planet platform. Hopefully we will get some more feedback soon. :) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
