Re: how bad would it be if we allowed all systems in communishift to get read-only access to fasjson?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:42:28AM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >However, this would be approximately one billion times easier if I didn't
> >need to worry about the hard part of automating something with fasjson,
> >which is keeping a kerberos ticket fresh from a keytab. (I'd love to run my
> >whole thing as a function-as-a-service function.)
> 
> Why do you consider this as a 'hard thing'?
> 
> If you are using GSSAPI, e.g. python-gssapi, you can rely on automated
> ticket acquisition provided by the GSSAPI library from MIT Kerberos.
> 
> export KRB5CCNAME=/path/to/ccache
> export KRB5_CLIENT_KTNAME=/path/to/keytab
> .. run your code ..
> 
> That's all.


Huh. All of the documentation I found suggested that there needed to be a
sidecar container ... and a bunch of complication. For example:
https://cloud.redhat.com/blog/kerberos-sidecar-container

So, if I provide the keytab as a secret, set the above environment
variables, and use requests-gssapi, it should just work? (And, does it
matter where ccache points?)


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux