On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:48 PM Frantisek Zatloukal <fzatlouk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > \o/, > > I'd like to ask if there is anybody familiar with the state of flask-oidc? It's been long-time broken with the latest itsdangerous, which was recently bumped in Rawhide, which broke all the applications using flask-oidc from Fedora repositories ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150955 ). > > There is an upstream PR against flask-oidc changing itsdangerous to pyJWT: https://github.com/puiterwijk/flask-oidc/pull/144 (which, according to my previous testing, makes the trouble go away). Can somebody take a look at it, and merge/release a new fixed version? I can handle pyJWT packaging in Fedora if this is the way forward. > > On a similar note, is the flask-oidc library the way to connect to FAS login for python applications? I had an impression that apps should migrate to this from plain openid (and I am planning to handle the transition of remaining Fedora QA apps). It seems abandoned upstream, so should the devs of python/flask apps use some other lib/way? > > Thanks a lot upfront! > There was an attempt to do something about this: https://github.com/fedora-infra/flask-oidc But it also seemingly died. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
