Re: Debugging Datanommer performance issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >  1. Sync the prod DB to staging.
>
> I think it might work, but not sure we have anyplace off hand with
> enough disk space. We might. I can look more if this is the way we want
> to go.

Well if we don't have the disk space on staging then let's do something else.

> > 2. Having a second datanommer DB in prod, and syncing them.
>
> It might be possible, but it's not a good way to go I don't think.

Okay, let's try to find a solution that we can reuse in a few months
when the database has grown again.

> > 3. Something else?
>
> Perhaps a aws instance? Just restore the db snapshot from prod and then
> spin up a small datagrepper instance to talk to it?

Sure, let's try that first!

A.
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux