On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 04:08:04PM +0000, Roberto Sassu via devel wrote: > Hi everyone > > (note for the infrastructure mailing list: please check if the changes > I'm proposing could be tested in the Fedora infrastructure, like Copr) copr uses a different signing setup... so probibly won't work there. We could perhaps work with you to try and get it in our staging env to test, but I am not sure how involved that might be. I guess the first step would be filing a infratructure ticket and explain what you would need to change/test. So, question for the change owners: This is not enabled by default, I assume you wish to enable it for something, can you expand on what you will use it for and what that helps you with? Also, is there any plan to enable it by default? Is there some way this could be useful to all our users? or more of our users? This change and the DIGLIM change both feel to me like we are spending time and effort enabling something that only helps a tiny fraction of our users. Is there some way this could be more generally useful to our users? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
