On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:14 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Okay, this is making me _very_ sure that we should automate these: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10441 > > That's because even though a human is spending time running the script, > there does not seem to be any opportunity for human intervention... this > happened: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39869 We give users a web form (Pagure) that invites human input, and then an automatic-but-human-sounding-response that gives the same response over and over, or eternal silence. There's no indication in the comment that this is not a human, or a clear link to the source code to improve anything about the situation. See my comment in https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/19865 . I hit a despairing moment like you did. Interesting that you're able to re-open your ticket, because I don't think my account has permission to do that in this Pagure project. Imagine if this was as easy as GitHub or GitLab, where I just click a button to create a new repo, or I run "git push" to create a new branch. I miss the clarity and simplicity of Pkgdb. I've mentored a new Fedora contributor through this process a while ago, and this scm-admin part was the point at which they gave up. - Ken _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
