On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 05:13:16PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a dns patch for review. > > We would like to add a second datanommer db server > so that we can migrate the current database to it and > make some changes such as adding the timescaledb > plugin to improve performance. This second server would > allow the migration to happen without affecting the main > prod server. > > The patch is available to view here: > https://gist.github.com/markobrien1/1b242fb8e27da07253550abf328a5e8e > > Please chime in with comments or +1's +1 with a few comments... You could also do a PR with the ansible changes. ;) Should be adding to inventory/inventory and inventory/host_vars/db-datanommer02.iad.fedoraproject.org and playbooks/groups/postgresql-server.yml (unless this deployment isn't using that role/playbook, I don't know if it is) Also, is this something worth also doing in staging? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
