On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 09:53:08AM -0000, Kamil Páral wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:49:21PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > > If I understood correctly, you can request more than 20 results, but if you > > don't specify how many you want, you'll only get 20. > > Pierre is right, requesting more results seems to be working fine, in my local testing. So I'd bump it to 100, personally, that seems like a reasonable value for our use cases. > > > I believe if you set it to 0 you may get everything, but this needs to be > > confirmed empirically. > > I only tested with a small dataset (~35 results), and the request with limit=0 returned the whole set. I guess there might be some hard cap on this, so you can't request the whole Bugzilla. But I wouldn't go this way anyway, using pagination is more server friendly, I believe. > > > Looks alright to me otherwise. > > Can we please get one more ack? Blockerbugs app is quite vital for QA at this point of the release cycle, and the sudden Bugzilla pagination change caught us with our pants down :-) Currently it doesn't update properly. Thanks. +1 to update it. I'd also suggest 100 since 0 might have some unknown limit on it. :) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
