On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 08:49:22PM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: > Looking through the fedora-infra org on github, there seems to be a > plethora of different branch names that all roughly cover the same > idea. > > Loosley put, there are a bunch of different ways to name branches for: > > * develop / dev / main / master > * staging / stage > * prod / stable > > Just wondering if there is a default recommendation for naming these 3 > branches in a project, and if there isn't can i propose: > > * dev > * staging > * stable Thats fine with me. I don't think we should go about changing them all at once tho... perhaps when/as we do the next release of them? Otherwise it seems like a lot of churn... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
