On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 02:09:48PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 19. 05. 21 v 20:45 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > You mean the link to nagios? Or ? > > Yes. The link to older outages is not needed with new design. > > > I'm a bit worried linking to nagios there will confuse people... > > Why? When something does not work (for me) then I go to status.f.o, then to Nagios and only then I file an issue. Sure, thats you or me or people who know about how things are setup. But end users who don't would go to nagios and see: Oh no, there's a blocking outage! bvmhost-a64-10.iad2.fedoraproject.org is down. I wonder if thats why the thing I wanted to do isn't working? Or: pagure02.fedoraproject.org swap is low, could that be why the getfedora site is loading slowly? Anyhow, I guess I won't die on this hill... but can we at least put it at the bottom with some kind of wording that doesn't get end users so lost? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
