On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:34:23AM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Sure, but if you could clean them up afterward that would be good. > > Will do, thanks. > > > +1 for me, though I'm not sure I follow the advantage of them over say fedocal, > > elections or the wiki. > > I could check the features I'm testing independently, such as group > membership, agreement signing, user attributes, etc. While apps have a > very diverse use of those features, for example with elections I can > check my user attributes but the app will only check if I signed the > required agreement when I try to vote in a currently active election. > If I just install the apps and check that I can log in, I'm afraid > I'll miss some of the testing I want to do just because I'm not > hitting the right code path. Fair, thanks for the explanation! Would it be worth keeping this app somewhere to check/debug potential auth issues later then? Pierre _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
