On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 15:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * Has staging been helpful to you? It's been useful to me a few times. For instance it was definitely useful when doing the initial fedmsg enablement for openQA and then for the port from fedmsg to fedora-messaging: we did both of those in staging first. Even though the 'staging' instance of openQA *itself* wasn't a real staging thing, it *did* publish to the staging fedmsg/fedora-messaging buses, so we could shake out the wrinkles in that without affecting prod, then deploy prod once we had it working. > * Is there anything we could do to make it better? This may be pretty niche, but I do wish the staging wiki contents were synced more often. Of course the sync process wipes out changes made directly on the staging wiki so there's a bit of a balance, but maybe auto-syncing every day or every few days would be good... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
