On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:30:02AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 8:19 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > I know this question has already been raised a few times, but I think we should > > raise it once more: what do we see as future for loopabull? > > > > It is currently triggered on 4 topics (3 from prod and 1 from stg) to do basically > > three actions: > > - Flag commit successfully built in koji, in other words it adds these flags > > to dist-git: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-filesystem/c/717f2a929bd25b62a0427e8e5c3792a0939dbfce > > - Flag when the Fedora CI start testing a PR > > - Flag when the Fedora CI finished testing a PR (and thus reports Pass/Fail) > > > > Wait, wait, wait, what?! These aren't things natively supported by the > software we use (Koji and Zuul)? It seems like the place to start here > would be to move this functionality to the right places. A koji plugin > and an extension for the Zuul pagure driver to do those things would > make a ton more sense here... Loopabull executes any playbook on a message, the fact that we're using it only for that is a mere accident, it's meant to be much more than that. We could in fact use it to do some of the releng tasks (that was one of the original idea for it), we just haven't got around to do that. Zuul may be an option here, though wouldn't it have the same issue as loopabull wrt secrets? Pierre _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
