On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:39:13PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 11:57, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:29:20AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 09:42, Michal Konecny <[1]mkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > I don't see the-new-hotness anywhere. Will it be deployed together > > with > > > Anitya? > > > > > > I think these 2 apps were in the Minimal Viable Fedora infra so they > > will > > > be deployed but in the second phase when all the hardware is > > available in > > > IAD2. > > > > Were or were not (in the Minimal Viable Fedora)? :) > > > > I guess "were not" but I can't be 100% sure about that :P Right, they were not in MVF. That said, they are in openshift and we have the cluster up, so we could go ahead and just deploy them anyhow. I'd suggest waiting until after move week tho to avoid splitting attention... so anytime after the 12th we could deploy them. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
