On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:32:21AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 08:34, Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: ...snip... > > An alternative could be to just increase the required spam-score from > > Basset to *very* high numbers (in the thousands), so it never sees > > someone as spam. > > That last one would mean it also doesn't need changes in the other > > apps that might be integrated with it, and it would still get all the > > useful info. > > > > That is probably the better plan. The tool has been very useful.. it is > just needing someone to do the tuning work or to expand it to do that > learning itself. I do not have that time, and I would prefer that people > knew that versus expecting to improve by itself. Yeah, the timesink is mostly 'spamcheck_manual' people. If we could adjust things so those just got passed I think it would go a long way to reducing this. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
