Re: some orphans we should take

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 09/04/20 02:50, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> The following packages showed up on the orphan list (for being FTBFS).
>
> We use and should take these over:
>
> pam_url
> python-robosignatory
> reg
>
> Any objections to having infra-sig take them?
> (I couldn't figure out how to do this in the pagure web interface tho)
>
> Then at least we need folks to fix them so they build.
>
> kevin
> _______________________________________________
I'd taken pam_url and robosignatory and added infra-sig group as admin 
to both.

I already had fixed python-robosignatory (currently built in rawhide, 
rebuilding in f32), but I don't have time today to look to pam_url... I 
will do tomorrow, if someone doesn't anticipate me.

I haven't found package "reg" in pagure...

Mattia

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux