I don't talk about the need of the feature itself, I'm just saying that
it's not worth to do the changes in the places that will be replaced anyway.
On 03/04/2020 22:04, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 11:08 +0200, Michal Konecny wrote:
#7880 email2fas not working in production (fedmsg/datanommer,
fedmsg/irc) - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7880
Trouble : medium
Gain : low
Not sure about this one, FAS will be replaced soon,
fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure will go away with fedmsg. I think this
is not worth our time, but we should instead think about including this
into fedora messaging.
Yeah, even if you replace the systems, the *feature* is still needed:
whether the lookup happens in FAS or AAA, whether the thing doing the
looking up is a fedmsg meta processor or a fedora-messaging schema,
"what Fedora account is associated with this email address?" is a thing
we need as long as we have messages from systems which give us email
addresses and not Fedora accounts (*cough cough* Bugzilla).
--
Role: Fedora CPE Team - Software Engineer
IRC: mkonecny
FAS: zlopez
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
