On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 09:45:10AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 08:17:38AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > I'm fine with 1 or 2, but think we should definitely *not* do 3 unless > > a) we know quite precisely how long it will take and b) that is > > substantially faster than the online autovac. > > Yeah. > > Just as a status update, the auto vac has been running about 1.5 days so > far. Things are slow, but there hasn't been a flood of complaints yet. In this case I'd say, let's keep it running for a while until we start to see a flood of complaints, at which point we can re-evaluate and see if we want to go with option #1. > I did disable backups last night because backups + this auto vac > definitely make it unusable. Having no backups is always annoying but not having a usable koji is as well, so +1 to that! Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
