On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 18:53, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 08:17:38AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I'm fine with 1 or 2, but think we should definitely *not* do 3 unless
> a) we know quite precisely how long it will take and b) that is
> substantially faster than the online autovac.
Yeah.
Just as a status update, the auto vac has been running about 1.5 days so
far. Things are slow, but there hasn't been a flood of complaints yet.
Should we try to bite the bullet ? since we are in freeze for F32 beta there might also be less activity.
Is there any way to see some sort of progress ?
Load on the db server is around 100 or so, when it's normally about 20
I did disable backups last night because backups + this auto vac
definitely make it unusable.
kevin
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
