On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 11:10, Randy Barlow <bowlofeggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 09:13 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > > Thanks for that recommendation. Can you point me to a place in > > ansible > > where you are using this? For this FBR I would rather not change it > > and > > go with the current solution. The goal is to completely remove the > > conditionals because it either works (everything uses the new > > approach) > > or it does not work at all (keep on using the current approach). If > > we > > would actually go the way to slowly switch more proxies one after > > another I would change the conditionals to how you described it. For > > now > > I would rather try it the way I currently have it. > > Hey Adrian! > > I am not sure that I have used the technique I describe in this Ansible > project, but I have been using it in some other Ansible projects I work > on. Unfortunately, none are public at the moment. > > Sure, I'm not opposed to the patch as-is, just a suggestion for > improvement. Let us go with the patch as is. Then let us put in for a Fedora Hackday where we re-engineer some playbooks to do this new method? -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
