On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 08:14:58AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 18:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:45:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hey, folks. Requesting a freeze break for this PR (as it applies to > > > comps-f31.xml.in): > > > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/427 > > > > > > In F31 'dnf-yum' is no more and 'yum' obsoletes it, but this was not > > > changed in comps. As a result, clean installs of F31 (and Rawhide) have > > > no 'yum' command, as we clearly intend they should. > > > > > > This isn't likely to make any images go oversize as all the 'yum' > > > package contains is a symlink linking /usr/bin/yum to /usr/bin/dnf-3 > > > and a manpage; /usr/bin/dnf-3 is part of python3-dnf which would > > > already be in all the images. > > > > I'm not sure if this is really an infrastructure thing to decide, but > > for FWIW, +1. :) > > I thought I needed an FBR to poke comps at this point? I mean if comps is in it's own 'fedora-comps' repo controlled by releng and is more 'data' than anything to infrastructure. > everyone wants some extra bureaucracy I can file a bug, propose it as > FE, we can vote to accept the bug as an FE, then we can vote on an FBR > to honor the FE...oh boy, I'm getting excited already! Yeah, I don't know if it's worth all that. How about we get the usual suspects to just vote in the PR? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
