On 9/9/19 8:25 AM, Matt Prahl wrote: > Hello, > On September 6th, the platform:f28 module was retired [1] because the issue > in MBS described in #1243 [2] was fixed, but due to a miscommunication, MBS > was not updated in Fedora's infrastructure to include the fix. Because of > this, any modules that buildrequire a module that was built on a retired > platform stream but can be installed on any Fedora version, can no longer > build. In practice, this occurs with modules that buildrequire the > "javapackages-tools" module. To see more of the backstory, you can read > #1243 [2]. > > The purpose of this email is to request a freeze exception to upgrade MBS > from v2.25.0 to v2.27.0. +1. This is just updating the rpm on frontends/backends? Or is there more to it? > > If this request is denied, I'd like permission to temporarily unretire the > platform:f28 stream in the MBS database as an alternative solution. > However, this alternative solution will cause any modulemd file that > buildrequires all platform streams to trigger a Fedora 28 build which will > fail. I'd really rather not do that... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
