Re: Fedora 31 Beta freeze now in effect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 8/27/19 3:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 8/27/19 11:50 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/27/19 2:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> Greetings.
>>>
>>> we are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 31
>>> Beta release. This is a pre release freeze.
>>>
>>> We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to
>>> release the Fedora 31 Beta when it's available.
>>>
>>> You can see a list of hosts that do not freeze by checking out the
>>> ansible repo and running the freezelist script:
>>>
>>> git clone
>>> https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/ansible.git
>>> ansible/scripts/freezelist -i inventory
>>
>> I had a problem with this because I didn't have python2 libraries
>> for ansible installed so the `import ansible.inventory` failed.
> 
> Ah, it's expected to run on batcave01... where it does work.
> 
>>
>> Switching the script to python3 worked. Should we apply this?
> 
> That would break it on batcave01... :(

We can't get the newer version there?

> 
>> $ git diff
>> diff --git a/scripts/freezelist b/scripts/freezelist
>> index 89856ea09..b1c99054c 100755
>> --- a/scripts/freezelist
>> +++ b/scripts/freezelist
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -#!/usr/bin/python
>> +#!/usr/bin/python3
>>  # skvidal
>>  # doteast: porting to ansible 2.0
>>  # dump out the hosts marked with 'freezes: true' in their vars
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Any hosts listed as freezes is frozen until 2019-09-17 (or later if
>>> release slips or uses the secondary target). Frozen hosts should have no
>>> changes made to them without a sign-off on the change from at least 2
>>> sysadmin-main or rel-eng members, along with (in most cases) a patch of
>>> the exact change to be made to this list.
>>
>>
>> I see the openshift nodes listed as frozen. What about applications that
>> are running in openshift? Can I commit changes to my apps that are for
>> CoreOS without a review? 
> 
> I think thats up to you all... since those are not directly related to
> the Fedora release, I'd say we wouldn't need to. Perhaps we would want
> to have a seperate (more targeted) freeze before the next FCOS release?
> Or perhaps it doesn't make sense? There are some things we do that are
> related to your release... signing artifacts, the updater app, etc.
> 
> I'm open to whatever works best for you all here.

I just want to know that I'm doing things that are allowed. If you feel comfortable
that I'm within my rights, then I'm happy.

Dusty
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux