Re: Proposal: Ansible Spring Cleaning: Update/upgrade scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/5/19 10:34 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 13:15, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So I was leaving the definitions vague as some build boxes are high
> priority (no redundancy or major outage) and some are low priority
> because they have a large amount of redundancy. I was figuring

Yeah, but you still need to notify people about those, and the audience
is different, so you will need to notify everyone and mention the
specific services. ;(

> 
> low priority:
> - proxies not shared on high priority external virthosts
> - builders and other high redundancy build systems
> - openshift systems IF updated and drained properly
> - other external services which have low SLE

Yeah, many or all of these could be done anytime, users shouldn't notice
an outage (prodixes can be taken out of dns, builders disabled,
openshift can migrate things around), etc.

> high priority:
> services with no redundancy:
> - databases
> - pagure
> - src
> - etc etc
> services with high outage effects
> - koji?
> - etc etc

Yeah, although even here... for example, we can switch to koji02 and
reboot koji01 without people really noticing. Of course kojidb is
another matter.

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux