Re: Future of fedora-packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/28/19 8:54 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 16:27, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/27/19 3:50 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
>>> So the fun fact is that we are already running elasticsearch with
>>> kibana and logstash [0] in our Openshift clusters. So maybe we can
>>> leverage on how this is deployed to run a dedicated instance for
>>> fedora-packages.
>>
>> Yeah.
>>
>> However, it's pretty tailored to logs of pods. It would likely be easier
>> to start with a dedicated elastic pod for searching packages, but then
>> you would need to teach it how to gather the info and write a frontend
>> for it. :(
> 
> Yes, it does not look like we can easily reuse this. I think our best
> chance is to work on making src.fp.o the new central place for
> packages, but we need to improve the search functionality of Pagure. I
> personally don't think we will have enough time to work on making a
> fedora-packages 2.0 except if someone else is interested in working on
> it.

Do you think this could be a good project for outreachy or the like if
you have time to mentor? Or is it too big for that kind of timeframe?

kevin


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux