Re: Future of fedora-packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/3/19 11:28 PM, Clement Verna wrote:

> The frontend will be an independent application that we will need to
> develop or as suggested by Ryan we may explore using src.fp.o. Having
> a separated backend for search capabilities makes a lot of sense to me
> since that makes this service easy to reuse by other apps and let
> people write their custom client if they wish to do so.

So, really this is about replacing xiapan with ES, right?
Since we will still need a app to interface with those results..

> With the idea to have a separate search backend with HTTP API, xapian
> is a problem since we have to write the HTTP wrapper around xapian's
> API to make it available to all, there is xapiand
> (https://kronuz.io/Xapiand/) but the project seems fairly recent and
> not yet mature. The other benefits of Elasticsearch are a maintained
> Python client, a maintained Javascript client, better documentation,
> largely adopted solution (easier to get people interested in).

Yeah, all good points.

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux