Re: cloud retirement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 4:17 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 3/1/19 4:36 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 27. 02. 19 v 23:00 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> >>> Hey everyone.
> >>>
> >>> As you know, we currently have a RHOSP5 ancient cloud. After a bunch of
> >>> work last year, we got a RHOSP13 cloud up and mostly working, but it was
> >>> a ton of work. After hearing from the Fedora Council and our various
> >>> management chains we determined that it wouldn't really be a good use of
> >>> our time moving forward to keep maintaining a OpenStack cloud.
> >>>
> >>> We have not yet determined what we want to do with the hardware that we
> >>> had allocated to this, but are weighing our options. We may want to
> >>> setup OpenShift bare nodes so we can do kubevirt, we may want to just
> >>> setup a normal virthost setup managed by ansible.
> >>>
> >>> For the items currently in our cloud, we will be looking at options for
> >>> them, we are definitely not shutting things off until we have plans in
> >>> place.
> >>>
> >>> Happy to answer any questions and will make sure everything is properly
> >>> migrated.
> >>
> >> Do we have a documented list of services running on that cloud instance?
> >
> > From inventory/inventory:
> ...snip...
>
> Thats just what is in ansible, there are other hosts also (although
> those should all be tranistory (copr builders or scratch hosts or test
> hosts, etc).
>
> As for timeline, I was moving last week, so I should be able to get back
> to it this coming week, especially since we should be in freeze soon.
> Since my current plan is to make the aarch64 and ppc64le hosts
> virthosts, I am going to try and get that done first so they can be used
> before anything else needs to be done. There's some networking changes
> needed, but hopefully in the next few weeks those will be online and
> copr can look at just using them from it's existing old cloud nodes.
> Then we can move on to the rest of the setup.
>

Could we consider using RHEV here? That would give us some way of
doing API-based provisioning without requiring anywhere close to the
complexity of RHOSP and still let us have some niceties like live
migration across nodes as needed.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux