On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 22:11, Jim Perrin <jperrin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > How much heresy is involved in us using Amazon's elasticsearch service > for this, so that we don't have yet-another-thing to maintain? If we want to proceed with elasticsearch I think that this is indeed a good way forward. What would it take to use our current AWS account to setup a test cluster ? > > On 2/27/19 4:19 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 14:39, Clement Verna <cverna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> fedora-packages [0] code base is showing its age. The code base and > >> the technology stack (Turbogears2 [1] web framework and the Moksha > >> [2] middleware) is currently not ready for Python3 and I am not > >> planning to do the work required to make it Python3 compatible, so the > >> application will stop working when Fedora 29 is EOL. > >> > >> In order to keep the service running, I have started a Proof Of > >> Concept (fedora-search [3]) to replace the backend of the application. > >> Fedora-search would be a REST API service offering full test search > >> API. Such a service would then be available for other application to > >> use, fedora-packages would then become a frontend only application > >> using the service provided by fedora-search. > >> > >> While the POC shows that this is a viable solution, I don't think that > >> we should be proceeding that way, for the simple reason that this add > >> yet another code base to maintain, I think we should use this > >> opportunity to consider using Elasticsearch instead of maintaining our > >> own "search engine". > >> > > > > The main issues to getting elasticsearch working in the past was the following: > > > > 1 The number of systems needed to make it work. There is a large > > difference from their 'proof-of-concept see how great this is' to 'ok > > you want to do anything with load' setups in everything from storage > > to number of search nodes to network speeds. [The number of hardware > > for the data we have was to start with 5-8 dedicated Dell systems, > > some amount of shared fast storage, and N virtual machines with a > > 10-40GB backbone.. or throwing all of Fedora Infrastructure at once > > into the cloud.. because the feed it from PHX2 to the cloud is > > expensive.] > > > > 2. Packaging of elasticsearch was a mess. At the time we had rules > > that all packages needed to be packaged in Fedora and follow Fedora > > packaging rules. [This one has been relaxed.] > > > > 3. Running of elasticsearch was a large service in itself. It doesn't > > take care of itself and we would need one or more people who know it > > well to keep it running. [This goes down the ladder.. the logstash > > backends are also full services.. ] Most of that was written in Java > > which no one on the team at the time had good experiences with. > > > > 4. A kibana/elasticsearch query expert. Just like any database, most > > of the queries you can make are the worse kind. They will take a lot > > more CPU/memory/time than they should making just grepping for data > > faster. > > > > However that is 3-5 years ago.. so a lot has changed since then. > > > > > >> I think that Elasticsearch offers quite a few advantages : > >> - Powerful Query language > >> - Python bindings > >> - Javascript bindings > >> - Can be deployed in our infrastructure or used as a service > >> - Can be useful for other applications ( docs.fp.o, pagure, ??) > >> > >> So what is the general feeling about using Elasticsearch in our > >> infrastructure ? Should we look at deploying a cluster in our infra / > >> Should we approach the Council to see if we can get founding to have > >> this service hosted by Elastic ? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Clément > >> > >> [0] - https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ > >> [1] - http://www.turbogears.org/ > >> [2] - https://mokshaproject.github.io/mokshaproject.net/ > >> [3] - https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-search > >> _______________________________________________ > >> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
