Re: Future of fedora-packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 5:56 PM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 14:36, Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:20 PM Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 2. Packaging of elasticsearch was a mess. At the time we had rules
> > > that all packages needed to be packaged in Fedora and follow Fedora
> > > packaging rules. [This one has been relaxed.]
> >
> > I just want to point out that Elasticsearch has been packaged [1] in
> > Fedora for more than 4 years.
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elasticsearch
>
> The version I am seeing there is 1.7.5 and the version on github is
> 6.6.1 .. i didn't know if that was a 'dont even think about using
> that'
>

Upstream skipped a bunch of versions. They went from 1.x to 2.x to 5.x
and now 6.x with 7.x in development.

I forgot the exact reason for this, but it had something to do with
aligning the versions across all of Elastic's software.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux