Re: Proposal: Add a separate “flatpaks/” namespace.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 12:28:51PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
>  * Reduce some confusion. A Flatpak is a module, but it’s *also* a
> container, and the dist-git repository will include files for both.

I'm +1 to this for this reason. I think it's less confusing than the
downside loose-module confusion. :)

In related news, I'm killing the rawtherapee "loose-rpm" module and just
making a flatpak one.

Question: would this open up the possiblity of offering different _flatpak_
streams? I'd like to have a stream where the rc releases are built so people
who want to try those can.


>  * We should probably move flatpak-common to the flatpaks/ namespace
> for ease of discovery, but it isn’t in any way a flatpak, it’s just a
> module that Flatpaks can depend on.

I'd suggest just making a flatpak-common repo in flatpaks/ with a README
linking to the module namespace.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux