On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 14:52 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 11/20/18 2:39 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > Hi, > > I am currently trying to build new resultsdb[0] into epel7-candidate. > > However, I am facing some (weird?) behavior around python-flask, > > > > I am able to do a successful build of resultsdb (depending on python-flask) > > in mock epel-7 and koji scratch epel-7 [1]. However, it is failing on > > not-available python-flask in koji to epel-7-candidate [2]. > > > > Am I overlooking something? > > > > Thanks very much! > > > > [0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/resultsdb/blob/epel7/f/resultsdb.spec > > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31025152 > > [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31025187 > > flask was pulled into rhel-extras (for docker distribution I think) and > when it was, it was only published for x86_64. > > Your package is noarch, but flask is not. > > So, you happened to get a x86_64 builder with your scratch build, but > your real build got a ppc builder where flask is not available. ;( > > I think you should be able to pass "Exclusivearch: noarch x86_64" and > have it work. If not, you can just resubmit your build until you get a > x86_64 builder. There are several packages like this, I think. It's a real pain. Is there no better solution we can come up with? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
