On 11/26/18 1:59 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 8:08 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 11/21/18 3:11 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> >>> Dne 20. 11. 18 v 23:52 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): >>> Was this resolved? >>> >>> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7671 >> >> I thought so, but the builds there have their logs cleaned up and the >> devel spec no longer has this in it. >> I tried a test package that I scratch built and it seemed to work fine. >> (ie, when I had ExclusiveArch: noarch aarc64 it always went to a aarch64 >> builder). > > "ExclusiveArch: aarch64" works while "ExclusiveArch: x86_64" does not. > The problem is that Koji may try to build packages with > "ExclusiveArch: x86_64" in i386 chroot. This is not fixed AFAIK. A fix > would be splitting x86_64/i386 hosts into two distinct groups and > assigning exactly one arch to each builder. That seems very odd to me. Do you have an example build of this? Shouldn't mock pass the right thing here? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
