On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:31 PM Dusty Mabe <dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/12/18 10:26 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> +1 LGTM
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:50 AM Dusty Mabe <dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/12/18 9:48 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> > We recently noticed inconstancy in OSTree version for ppc64le ISO in compose
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-29-updates-20181112.0/compose/ .
> > OSTree version for ppc64le ISO was 29.20181111.0 while expected was 29.20181112.0.
> >
> > This patch (available in email attachment) is to fix inconsistency in OSTree
> > version which may occur during AH artifacts creation.
> > pull ostree content from repo https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/atomic/repo/
> > instead of https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/atomic/repo/.
> >
>
> patch LGTM
pushed and playbook ran.
Thanks Dusty!
Dusty
--
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
