Re: Statistics. Stats for installled or downloaded packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 09:56, Anatoli Babenia <anatoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Good Monday. )
>
> I am trying to find package installation/download statistics for Fedora. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Statistics is the page that pops up first in search results, and it is kind of 6 years outdated. It would be really great to update it with current situation. I can not do this, because acquiring CLA+1 for wiki edits is too hard and didn't happen even though I sent several requests to different groups. The second reason - I don't know what to write as there seems to be no contact point except this groups.
>

I think the page should be archived/removed. Mainly because a lot of
the questions people want answers for usually also get in the way of
people wanting privacy. Currently there is no way to know what
packages are being installed/downloaded the most. yum and dnf
downloads not provide those answers on purpose (it would require more
computational power on the servers than we have and it can't be easily
made anonymous. The data we can get is only basic information like
'what version of yum/dnf used', 'what arch was asked for', 'what was
the version of Fedora/EPEL wanted' and 'what was the public ip
address'. This loses all kinds of additional information and masks
things like proxies, mock builds, etc which inflate/deflate numbers in
different ways.

> There is also unlinked https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Statistics_2.0 page with many good stories including mine - `Parse mirror logs: what packages are being the most downloaded?`, but no links or tracker items to see the status and jump in.
>

That page is even older than the one you pointed to and should also be
archived/removed. We are probably on Statistics 5.0

> I found a request to open stats@ list https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/2223 which speaks about https://github.com/fedora-infra/datanommer/ as a new location. There are still no examples of getting package popularity data.
>
> I need stats to see how many people are using qdigidoc package to make it more official.

I am sorry but there is no way to answer that question.

> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux