On 09/26/2018 10:53 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: > During the last months most mirror problems have been related to > report_mirror reporting that mirrors are up to date and the crawler then > marking the mirror as not up to date. Which resulted in mirrors being > added and removed from the mirrorlist every few hours. > > As the crawler normally sees what the user sees, means that > report_mirror often reports the wrong mirror status. > > I would like to ignore report_mirror results for non-private mirrors in > the future. For private mirrors report_mirror is the only way to know > which content it has, for public mirrors it is not really necessary as > the mirrors are crawled anyway and report_mirror does not contain enough > information anyway right now. > > Any objections to ignore report_mirror reports for public mirrors > after the F29 release. Seems reasonable to me. Perhaps we could output this info when such a mirror reports in? ie, "you are a public mirror and we are ignoring report_mirror data for you, please see https://... for details" kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
