Re: Moving forward with Fedora's PDC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> everything should be there for
> this with one exception: We really want to have some check in place for
> s2i so that it checks license, so we don't accidentally push out
> something thats not under a open source license. This doesn't need to be
> a blocker, but it would be great to get in place soon.

I could see that as an integration test in PDC, or have a regular (or
evented) job on the devpi host that would check the licences of all
cached (and thus requested) packages.
The downside of doing it on devpi is that we won't know directly which
app has requested the nonfree package. Since all dependencies are
already available locally and the license is in the package metadata
(PKG-INFO file), a script running in the integration testsuite
wouldn't even need internet access.

I can write a POC if you want.

A.
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux