Re: Updates for AtomicHost artifacts in bodhi pungi runs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



LGTM +1
But, can we add a branched release variable, so that we dont need to add
the branch release version multiple times at different places?

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 4:06 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/01/2018 06:58 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> [PATCH 1/5] bodhi-pungi: f29 will be new branched target
> [PATCH 2/5] bodhi-pungi: convert image-build to use non branched
> [PATCH 3/5] bodhi-pungi: only provide one repo to lorax
> [PATCH 4/5] bodhi-pungi: s/Atomic/AtomicHost/
> [PATCH 5/5] bodhi-pungi: add vagrant box creation
>
> The commit messages should give a good idea of what is related to each
> one. The biggest thing is working around a lorax/dnf bug for now in
> patch 3.

Cool. Thanks for sending these. ;)

Looks good to me. +1

kevin

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/X4KNJVZCHCXNYFBVTDMKVL23OYB2IPHK/
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/3VHF7QLJVRQ5C6PL5VGBMCXLHSN2O2IT/

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux