Hi, On 05/29/2018 09:31 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Aurelien Bompard < > abompard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> What do you think of this proposal? Any blind spots? >> > > Not that I disagree, but please add/expand a section as to why AMQP (and > RabbitMQ) was chosen over other messaging technologies. Thanks for the feedback, I've added a small section[0]. It is, perhaps, a little wishy-washy. I don't want to give the impression that we couldn't implement this with a different messaging protocol or a different broker. We definitely could. AMQP has short-comings, to be sure, but the RabbitMQ extensions (mainly pulisher acks) cover the most important ones in my opinion. I did some research, but I'd definitely welcome feedback on protocols and brokers. I've read all or nearly all of the AMQP 0.9, ZeroMQ, and STOMP protocols, and I skimmed through the MQTT protocol, but I've not looked closely at the AMQP 1.0 protocol and I'm by no means a message protocol expert. As for brokers, my only experience is with Qpid and RabbitMQ and that experience points me firmly at RabbitMQ. I don't know much about running ActiveMQ. [0] https://fedmsg-migration-tools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/migration/overview.html#why-amqp-and-rabbitmq Thanks, Jeremy _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/2ARVA7MSRJ5NALJL2O5CGWB4BGCKJ67S/
