On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:20:19AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Some background/history: > > For ages we have had the fedora-web sites. These sites are in one git > repo in pagure and we have build roles for them on sundries servers. > This checks out the source from git and builds the site and then the > proxies sync it and serve it as static content. > > A while back the budget site (which was under fedora-web) moved out of > it as a proof of concept of a new docs workflow. In this flow their is a > git repo for the source, and another git repo with the finished built > static site and on our sundries servers we just pull the built site and > proxies sync it and serve it as static content. There's no building on > our side it's all done. > > When budget moved it was kind of a proof of concept, so I just tweaked > the fedora-web build script to also pull that site. However, it really > should be it's own role and not tied to fedora-web or that process. > > Finally the request in ticket > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6371 to build the staging > budget site faster, which would require moving it out of the fedora-web > scripts. > > I'd like to make this change. It should be almost no change in > production aside from removing it from the fedora-web build script and > adding it's own git pull script and cron job (all contents will be the > same as will the update freq). In staging it will be the same, but > updating faster. > > +1s? > +1 for me. Pierre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
